ACCESS DISABILITY PPT ESSAY ASSIGNMENT
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
ACCESS DISABILITY PPT ESSAY ASSIGNMENT
Sources:5
Subject: Other
Topic: ACCESS DISABILITY PPT
Paper details:
REVISION: Client: I have one concern the
(1) this is an animated presentation you don’t do video so this is why I ask for the assignment to be done in this format it need music in the background next the word I cannot submit that because that work was already submitted so it’s going to be plagiarism through safe assign next the writer as to be more creative this is a presentation on disability Client:
The presentation has to be in a digital animated format the word doc that assignment was already submitted through SafeAssign it cannot use else it’s plagiarism I only wanted the writer to see it to have an idea what the assignment is base from but he need to be creative Client: There as to be music in the background this presentation as to captivate the audience watching it while it talks about the social model, universal design , ableism and other this while he incorporated the use of peer review article this as to be captivating and education include call for action self-advocacy things like that you are defending persons with disability Dear Writer,
(2) that same word doc is only to guide the writer on what the assignment was all about what the assignment is based on
(3) the writer as to talk about
(1) universal design
(2) social model
(3) ableism
(4) social justice calls to action
(5) self-advocacy and the use of at least three peer review article those article must not be medical related because the teacher don’t want that I know the writer did talk about some of what I have mention but he cannot use them with the same information he has to change it up this information will be presenting to the class so it has to be captivating it need to captivate the audience attention you are representing person with a disability so the information as to be informative.
Dear Writer, Please and he has to use different pictures because all these were submitted through safe assign. Pls tell the writer this is 40% of my grade it’s ok if he doesn’t know how to do the other section that’s fine but this section as to be very well done we’ll informative, well-elaborated well detailed and information he has to make a point Well in-depth It’s very important
(1) this assignment is connected to 7670121 please to follow all the instructions and expectations of the assignment and the rubric all articles as to be peer review and additional pls continue to back it up with the materials that you already have form class materials. and please ensure you connect with the social model, universal model and advocacy assignment as to be well in-depth, well organize, well elaborated, and well detailed due on the 5 the Dec at 12noon midday please use rubRic that is very important
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results