AFIT Hubble Space Telescope Case Study
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
AFIT Hubble Space Telescope Case Study
Prompt: Review the AFIT GPS Case Study and the AFIT Hubble Space Telescope Case Study, and choose one case study for use with your final project. Keep in mind as you craft your submission that you will be learning more about the sections of the final project (Systems Life-Cycle, Requirements,
Trade-Off Studies, and Risk Management) as we move through the course. This milestone is a place to share what you know now, as well as what questions you have related to your case study. The SEBoK acronym list may be helpful as you complete this milestone.
This milestone should address the critical elements below, which include a draft of the Systems Life-Cycle portion of your final project. Link to the SEBoK List: https://www.sebokwiki.org/wiki/Acronyms
Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:
∙ Describe which case study you chose and why.
∙ Explain what is interesting to you about this case study.
∙ Select sections of the case study to use for the following sections of the final project for planning purposes in the next milestones: Systems Life-Cycle, Requirements, Trade-Off Studies, and Risk Management
Systems Life-Cycle:
Illustrate the principal products and activities of the development project. What development process was used? To what extent did the development process reflect your understanding of the systems life-cycle? What best practices were missing? To the extent possible, use specific examples to illustrate. If the required information is not readily available or is incomplete in the case study, you may make assumptions, as long as they are clearly stated.
Analyze the deployment of the system. For example, how was the system integrated (i.e., the pieces put together and installed into the operational environment)? How was the system fielded?
What lessons were learned? To the extent possible, use specific examples to illustrate. If the required information is not readily available or is incomplete in the case study, you may make assumptions, as long as they are clearly stated.
Examine the plans for the future of the system. For example, how will the system be maintained (e.g., repaired and updated)? How is the future evolution of the system being planned and managed? To the extent possible, use specific examples to illustrate. If the required information is not readily available or is incomplete in the case study, you may make assumptions, as long as they are clearly stated.
Guidelines for Submission: Summit a 3 page Microsoft Word document, double spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins APA Format.
Space Telescope
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow AFIT Hubble Space Telescope Case Study
AFIT Hubble Space Telescope Case Study