An approach to ethics for the administrative role
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
An approach to ethics for the administrative role
PLEASE EXPLAIN WHETHER YOU AGREE WITH MY CLASSMATE ANSWER TO THE ABOVE QUESTION AND WHY? (1 Page)
CLASSMATE’S POST
The reading assignment doesn’t necessarily point of specific ethical principles within the text. However, it does address conflicts that may arise in public administration or in
working with the public. It is very clear there is not any one particular virtue that a person must possess in working with the public. The ethical dilemmas may manifest themselves
from various conflicts. Conflicts of authority arise when the law mandates on course of action but the boss or authority orders you to do something else (Cooper, 2012, p 94). The
ethical dilemma is to obey the law or to obey the authority. One could argue that law supersedes authority, however that isn’t always the case in public administrator duties. The
administrator must weigh their own future successes in their position due to consequences of not doing as the authority figure instructs. This isn’t an easy solution. Another
conflict is outside versus inside roles of the position or objective responsibilities versus subjective responsibilities. Objective responsibilities are formal obligations while subjective
responsibilities are underlying values (Cooper, 2012, p 108). When those are in conflict, it can be a challenge for an administrator. In order to address this conflict, it is important to
learn moral imagination (Cooper, 2012, p 110). In other words, a moral basis for the solution of moral conflicts (Cooper, 2012, p 110). Conflicts of interest are dangerous in
public administration positions. Conflict of interest is when our personal interests are at odds with our obligations as a public official or our professional values (Cooper, 2012, p
112). In other words it is conflict between our public roles and our personal self- interest. All three of these can make it very challenging to maintain virtues in public administration.
There are no clear virtues that align with these challenges.
Reference:
Cooper, T. (2012). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role (6th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
An approach to ethics for the administrative role
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results