ANA Standards Article and Commentary
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 |
Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago |
Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
ANA Standards Article and Commentary
Professional Role Transition
Video Assignment: ANA Standards Article and Commentary
Instructions:
· Review the ANA Standards document in the Brightspace course shell. Focus on the Standards of Professional Performance.
· Choose one of the 17 standards that captures your attention.
· Search for a relevant journal article which explains or discusses the importance of this standard to professional nursing.
· Consider the prompts below.
· Plan, organize, and practice your video content.
· Keep your video to three to four minutes.
Topics and prompts to include in the video:
1. Introduction
a. Announce the chosen Standard of Professional Performance using the number and name from the document in Brightspace.
b. Briefly define the Standard.
2. Journal Article
a. Provide the title, author, date of publication, and where you found the article.
b. Briefly summarize the article and explain how the article connects professional nursing to the chosen Standard.
3. Commentary
a. What does this Standard add to your understanding of the nursing profession?
b. Why do you think the Standard is relevant to nursing today?
c. Provide a concrete example of how you can (and will) incorporate this Standard into your nursing practice.
Remember
· Speak clearly.
· A well-rehearsed video is the key to success!
· Keep you video under four minutes.
· Consult the grading rubric so you are aware of how the points are awarded.
JD/2020
ANA Standards Article and Commentary
RUBRIC
|
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
|
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
|
Average Score
50-85%
|
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
|
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
|
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
|
Poor Quality
0-45%
|
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
|
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
|
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
|
|
|
|
|
|
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
ANA Standards Article and Commentary
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
ANA Standards Article and Commentary
Instructions:
ANA Standards Article and Commentary
Professional Role Transition
Video Assignment: ANA Standards Article and Commentary
Instructions:
· Review the ANA Standards document in the Brightspace course shell. Focus on the Standards of Professional Performance.
· Choose one of the 17 standards that captures your attention.
· Search for a relevant journal article which explains or discusses the importance of this standard to professional nursing.
· Consider the prompts below.
· Plan, organize, and practice your video content.
· Keep your video to three to four minutes.
Topics and prompts to include in the video:
1. Introduction
a. Announce the chosen Standard of Professional Performance using the number and name from the document in Brightspace.
b. Briefly define the Standard.
2. Journal Article
a. Provide the title, author, date of publication, and where you found the article.
b. Briefly summarize the article and explain how the article connects professional nursing to the chosen Standard.
3. Commentary
a. What does this Standard add to your understanding of the nursing profession?
b. Why do you think the Standard is relevant to nursing today?
c. Provide a concrete example of how you can (and will) incorporate this Standard into your nursing practice.
Remember
· Speak clearly.
· A well-rehearsed video is the key to success!
· Keep you video under four minutes.
· Consult the grading rubric so you are aware of how the points are awarded.
JD/2020
ANA Standards Article and Commentary
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
ANA Standards Article and Commentary
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
admin
Related posts
Applying Course Knowledge to Ethical Leadership
Read more
Assessing And Treating Pediatric Patients With Mood Disorders
Read more
Language Health Professions
Read more