Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data
Question Description
Part 3: Results
Use two Scholars of Change videos, one phone interview (See attached), other data gathered from social change website or documents you might have. Code the transcripts and the interview and write up the results of your findings. You will include the following sections in your write-up:
A. Data Sourcesbriefly describe each data source including location, duration of data collection, how data were recorded, and unusual circumstances.
? Two Scholars of Change videos
? One phone interview
Resources from other websites
B. Instrumentationbriefly describe the type of instrumentation you used for your data collection.
? Who developed each data collection tool and what is the date of publication?
? Where and with which participant group has it been used previously?
? How appropriate is it for the current study and include whether modifications will be or were needed?
C. Data Analysisbased on the data sources in A., provide a detailed analysis to include the following:
? Report the process used to move inductively from coded units to larger representations including categories and themes.
? Describe the specific codes, categories, and themes that emerged from the data using quotations as needed to emphasize their importance.
1. 1st cycledescribe, give examples.
2. 2nd cycledescribe, give examples/moving from codes to categories.
3. Identify themesprovide examples and illustrate your results with a figure or a chart.
Part 4: Trustworthiness and Summary
D. Trustworthinesssummarize across the different data sources and respond to the following:
? What themes are in common?
? What sources have different themes?
? Explain the trustworthiness of your findings, in terms of:
o Credibility
o Transferability
o Dependability strategies
o Confirmability
E. Summary
? Based on the results of your analyses, how would you answer the question: What is the meaning of social change for Walden graduate students?
? Self-ReflectionHas your own understanding of you as a positive social change agent changed? Explain your reasoning.
? Based on your review of the three articles on social change, which one is aligned with your interests regarding social change and why?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data |
Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data