Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
1. Include an introduction that emphasizes and outlines the significance of the issue.
2. Conduct a review of at least five peer-reviewed articles. These articles must be described in your essay’s content as well as in your citations. Websites, movies, books, blogs, news items, and newspapers are not considered “PEER-REVIEWED” articles. In class, examples of “peer-reviewed publications” are displayed, and a file titled “How to find peer-reviewed journal articles” is available on Canvas at the SJSU library.
3. Talk about the key points of the articles on your topic. Please explain why you chose them and go over the key points of each article. Are these articles in agreement or disagreement with one another?
4. Talk about how the research papers relate to what we’ve learned in class. Also, depending on your literature review, explain your own thoughts on this research topic.
5. Times New Roman, 12 font, double spaced, 1 inch margins, at least 4 pages total. Please submit your work through Canvas. The score of TURNITIN will be evaluated.
6. The citations must be included in the main text’s discussion. For your citation, please use the guidelines provided by the American Meteorological Society:
https://www.ametsoc.org/ams/index.cfm/publications/authors/journal-and-bams-authors/journal-and-bams-authors-guide/references/ (This is a link to another website.)
7. The reference list is included at the end of your work and is not included in the page count.
8. Plagiarism would be considered if the TURNITIN check found more than 20% resemblance.
Criteria for rating in detail (please check the Rubric)
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Analysis of Floods and Climate Change |
Analysis of Floods and Climate Change