Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Analysis of Multiple
Choice and Constructed-Response Questions
Project 2: Narrative on the test (200 points)
Analysis of Multiple-Choice and Constructed-Response Questions
Identify the targeted grade level of your assessment.
Identify appropriate standards and/or subsections of standards for EACH item. In other words, what standard is each test question assessing? o Example: RL 10.4 Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text.
Identify the number of points for each question/section and justify the distribution of points.
Discuss: Can a student earn a passing grade on your test without having demonstrated the targeted DOK level of the standards being assessed? Justify question distribution of rigor.
Analysis of Essay Test and Scoring Rubric
Identify the targeted grade level of your assessment (does not need to be the same as for your MC/CR test).
Identify the appropriate standards your essay is to assess.
Provide a bulleted list of key elements you expect a proficient response to address. Identify additional elements you expect an advanced response to address.
Defend your rubric descriptors for each criterion you selected. Provide evidence that your scoring indicators at each level of achievement clearly delineated so that there is no question about what type of response earns a score of 4, 3, 2, or 1.
Choice and Constructed-Response Questions
Analysis of Multiple
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Analysis of Multiple