Analysis of The Chosen Court Case Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Analysis of The Chosen Court Case Essay
Choose one of the court cases on page 444 of the course text to analyze. Provide a 1-page analysis of the chosen court case in APA format that includes the key details and rulings
- ACLU of N.J. v. Black Horse Pike Reg’l Bd. of Educ., 84 F.3d 1471 (3d Cir. 1996)
- Adler v. Duval Cnty. Sch. Bd., 851 F. Supp. 446 (M.D. Fla. 1994) (“Adler I”); 174 F.3d 1236(11th Cir. 1999), vacated, 531 U.S. 801 (2000) (“Adler II”); 112 F.3d 1475 (11th Cir.1997) (“Adler II”), vacated, 531 U.S. 801 (2000); 206 F.3d 1070 (11thCir. 2000)(“Adler III”); 250 F.3d 1330 (11th Cir. 2001) (“Adler IV”)
- Borden v. Sch. Dist. of Twp. of E. Brunswick, 523 F.3d 153 (3d Cir. 2008),cert. denied129 S. Ct.1524 (2009)
- Brown v. Gilmore, 258 F.3d 265 (4th Cir. 2001),cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 465 (2001)
- Chaudhuri v. State of Tenn., 130 F.3d 232 (6th Cir. 1997)
- County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union, 492 U.S. 573 (1989)
- Doe v. Duncanville Indep. Sch. Dist., 70 F.3d 402 (5th Cir. 1995)
- Elk Grove Unified Sch. Dist. v. Newdow, 542 U.S. 1 (2004)
- Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962)
- Everson v. Bd. of Educ., 330 U.S. 1 (1947)
- Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006)
- Hadley v. Rush Henrietta Sch. Dist., 409 F. Supp. 2d 164 (W.D.N.Y. 2006)
- Jager v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist., 862 F.2d 824 (11th Cir. 1989)
- Jones v. Clear Creek Indep. Sch. Dist., 977 F.2d 963 (5th Cir. 1992),cert. denied, 508 U.S. 967(1993)
- Lassonde v. Pleasanton Unified Sch. Dist., 320 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2003)
- Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577 (1992)
- Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)
- Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668 (1984)
- Menora v. Ill. High Sch. Ass’n, 683 F.2d 1030 (7th Cir. 1982)
- Newdow v. United States Cong., 328 F.3d 466 (9th Cir. 2003)
- Newdow v. Rio Linda Union Sch. Dist., 597 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2010)
- Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Doe, 530 U.S. 290 (2000)
- Victory Through Jesus Sports Ministry Found. v. Lee’s Summit R-7 Sch. Dist., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS54388 (W.D. Mo. June 3, 2010); 640 F.3d 329, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10173 (8th Cir.Mo. 2011)
- Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985)
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results