Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Choose a strategy for dealing with poverty, inequality, or development (e.g., Land titling, UBI, Microlending, SDG, Co-op, Global Wealth Tax, or some other approach). In just a few pages,
You should (1) describe the strategy and (2) explain what it is supposed to accomplish and how it will be accomplished. (3) Can you tell me when it was initially introduced and/or where it has subsequently been implemented? (4) Who or what group(s) or organization(s) is/are in charge of its execution and oversight? (5) What metrics, if any, does it use to determine whether or not the implementation was successful? (6) What, if any, political, economic, or strategic obstacles have stymied implementation? (6) Has this strategy worked, failed, been mixed, proven problematic, or is it too early to tell? Explain. (7) Have you heard of any suggested cures or reforms to better the technique you picked, or do you have any suggestions? Explain.
At least three sources must be referenced (they can be material we read during the course or other material you have encountered or sought out). You must use parenthetical or footnote citations to cite quotes or paraphrases. I don’t have a favorite citation style (APA, Chicago, MLA, etc. ), but you should choose one and stick to it. In addition to in-text parenthetical citations (Bar, 2021: 3) and footnote citations[1], in-text parenthetical citations (Bar, 2021: 3) and footnote citations (Bar, 2021: 3)
You must include a bibliography that includes the author’s name, title of work, publisher’s name, year of publication, and url (or whatever information is available/relevant). A list of URLs is insufficient for a bibliography and will result in a deduction of points.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Analysis Paper on Sustainable Development Goals