Analyzing a Persuasive Public Address Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Analyzing a Persuasive Public Address Assignment
Name:________
Analyzing a Persuasive Public Address
Name of Orator:
Title of Speech:
Occasion / Place delivered:
Date Speech was delivered:
- Brief Biography (Education/Current Role/Status) of the Speaker (What is the source of the speaker’s ethos-credibility to make these arguments to the audience?)
- The Rhetorical Situation for the Speech
- The Issue (Exigence-something in the situation that demands response)
- The Audiences (Immediate and secondary)
- The Constraints of the Situation (to the purpose/goal of the speech)
III. The Structure/Organization of the Speech
- Opening: How does the speaker open the speech?
- Body: What is the actual structure/organizational plan of the speech? Problem solution, motivated sequence, etc.
- Closing: How does the speaker close the speech? with a plea for action, or…
- Description and Analysis, and Evaluations of the Arguments advanced by the speaker.
- What did you perceive to be the goal of the speaker for this address?
- What logical arguments does the speaker use? Give examples.
- What are some examples of pathos (emotion) used by the speaker?
- Was there an example of ethos in the speech?
- Were there any logical fallacies?
- Style and Delivery
- Style: Describe the tone of the speech, give examples of figurative/memorable language used in the speech.
- Delivery: If you were able to watch a video of the speech–what was your impression of the delivery? Did you find any reviews or comments by others about the impact of the delivery?
- Historical and Rhetorical Value (Was it a good speech? Did the speaker accomplish the purpose?) What did the critics say? What standard should be used to judge it?
VII. Bibliography
Analyzing a Persuasive Public Address Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyzing a Persuasive Public Address Assignment