Analyzing and discussing a past emergency incident essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Analyzing and discussing a past emergency incident essay
In this project you analyze and discuss a past emergency incident and a possible future emergency hazard. You will apply what you have learned throughout the course to the analysis and address the key
discussion points.
In emergency management it is important to remember that locations also make a difference. People like to live in areas with nice climates that are close to coasts, mountains, and major cities; albeit in
hazardous locations. It is also economically difficult to move for many household residents. History, tradition and culture also tie people to meaningful places where they enjoy a sense of connection. Consider
the following questions and key discussion points in composing your paper.
Do you think these trends of living location will continue? Is there a way to make society safer over the long term? Or, have we gone down a path of no return? Contemplate the future, would you live or work in
such places of risk, and why?
Consider past disasters as part of your analysis and discussion, such as Hurricane Katrina, the earthquakes in Haiti and Pakistan, the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami, Hurricane Sandy, the 9/11/01 terrorist attack
on New York City, and the Tsunami/nuclear reactor plant disaster in Japan. These are just some that should be included in your analysis and discussion. Select key learning points from each to apply to a future
hypothetical disaster.
Consider whether your city is a potential location for a terrorist attack? Subject to frequent flooding? Is it at the intersection of major transportation arteries? Would you want to move away from jobs, families,
familiar areas just to be safer? Is population in the community decreasing or increasing – and are either of those trends related to safety or are other factors at work? How has human behavior influenced disaster
vulnerability such as allowing development in flood prone areas or living along the coast – and what can be done about this (consider mitigating factors). At this time in your paper you should be considering
systems theory and focusing on potential efforts in each of the system components.
The paper is to be a minimum of 2000 words (8-10 pages). Be sure to include citations for all references, (8 to 10 references) including information about the incident. Also, use scholarly material for your
alternative theory, (Wikipedia is not permitted as a source), and any support for your discussion. Your textbook from the class should be your starting point, but your primary sources of information should be
scholarly in nature.
Analyzing and discussing a past emergency incident essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results