Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Paper details:
Analyzing Research on Assessment In Part 1 of this assignment, you will develop a case study illustrating best practice application of an assessment/measurement instrument used for early childhood participants. In preparation for evaluation of the instrument in Module 2, you will select and describe a child who will serve as a target participant and a single published instrument of assessment or measurement appropriate to young children, including the target participant. The instrument should be specifically intended for one developmental level and topic area (for example, toddler and cognitive development). Then you will locate, summarize, and compare the major points of at least three professional journal articles published in the last five years related to the assessment/measurement instrument or facets of the instrument.
Create a 3- to 5-page paper (not including the title and references pages) in a Word document for your response. Use APA format for the title page, references page, and in-text citations. Use the part titles as subheadings. Develop an introduction and conclusion for the paper. Part 1: Participant and Instrument Selection Step 1. Select Select a child who will serve as the target participant in the case study. Refer to the child by initial rather than name; for example, R instead of Robert or Child 1. Step 2. Develop Develop a profile of the participant. Include the childs demographic, personal/home, and educational information. Step 3. Choose Choose a single published instrument of assessment/measurement appropriate to young children, including the target participant.
The instrument should be for specific age group and developmental levels, such as toddler and cognitive development. Relate the target participant and your choice of the assessment/measurement instrument. See the Module 1 Learning Object for resources and examples of published assessment/measurement instruments. Part 2: Article Summary and Comparison Digital Learning Connections icon Step 4. Compare Compare the major points of at least three professional journal articles published in the last five years related to the assessment/measurement instrument or facets of the assessment/measurement you will use with the target participant in your case study. Step 5. Submit Submit your final 3 to 5-page paper. Step 6. Look ahead Look ahead at the Module 3 assignment which requires conducting three observations. *Follow APA 7th edition. Use 11-point Arial or 12-point Times New Roman font. APA 7th edition
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Analyzing Research on Assessment Assignment |
Analyzing Research on Assessment Assignment