Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Ancient Science Writing in Greco Roman Antiquity Questions
1) What is Taub’s main argument in this piece? What points does she bring up to support her argument?
2) Reread the paragraph on page 4 which begins: “The way in which technical texts are studied has begun to change.” What do you think of studying ancient scientific texts in this way, as true “literary” texts? How might we bring this kind of reading to our class?
3) Reread the paragraph entitled “Defining Greco-Roman” on page 7. What is Taub saying about specifically Roman scientists in antiquity?
4) Look up one ancient (NOT modern!) text and/or author mentioned by Taub (preferably one you have never heard of or know little about). Give a brief summary of the ANCIENT author and/or text and genre. Cite your source.
Ancient Science Writing in Greco Roman Antiquity Questions
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Ancient Science Writing in Greco Roman Antiquity Questions |
Ancient Science Writing in Greco Roman Antiquity Questions