Animal testing and ethics
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Animal testing and ethics
Animal testing is a controversial issue in the field of ethics. The use of animals in scientific research and testing has been a common practice for many years, and it has contributed to many important medical and scientific discoveries. However, there are ethical concerns about the use of animals in research, particularly when it involves pain and suffering.
On one hand, supporters of animal testing argue that it is necessary for the development of new medicines, vaccines, and treatments for various diseases. They argue that animals have been used in research for centuries and that it is the best way to ensure that new products are safe and effective for human use. They also argue that the benefits of animal testing outweigh the harm done to the animals.
On the other hand, opponents of animal testing argue that it is unethical to use animals for human purposes, particularly when it involves inflicting pain and suffering. They argue that animals have the capacity to feel pain and that they should be treated with the same respect and consideration as humans. They also argue that there are alternatives to animal testing, such as computer simulations and in vitro testing, that can be used instead.
In recent years, there has been growing awareness and concern about the ethical issues surrounding animal testing. Many countries have introduced legislation to regulate the use of animals in research, and there is an increasing push towards the development of alternative methods. It is important for scientists, policymakers, and the public to continue to debate the issue and work towards finding solutions that balance the need for scientific progress with the ethical concerns surrounding animal welfare.
Animal testing and ethics
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow