Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Anonymity on the Internet Discussion
Anonymity on the Internet
Web sites, such as anonymizer.com, and software, such as TOR, provide tools and services that enable a person to send emails, surf the Web, post blogs and chat anonymously. These tools have been criticized for helping criminals and terrorists to conduct illegal business without fear of being caught. While this is true, these tools are also heavily used by law enforcement and the military to catch criminals and terrorists. They have been especially useful in catching sexual predators that target minors on social networking sites (Facebook, mySpace, Twitter, etc.).
Anonymity on the Internet Discussion
The tools are also used by:
Businesses to safe guard the transmission of trade secrets.
Victims of crime, such as rape, to engage in online support groups anonymously.
People with alternate, but legal, lifestyles to communicate safely.
People with medical conditions that carry a stigma, such as AIDS or certain mental disorders to engage in online support groups anonymously.
These are just a few of the legal activities that benefit form anonymity on the Internet. Do you feel that the benefits of these sites and tools outweigh the problems? Why or why not?
Anonymity on the Internet Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|
Anonymity on the Internet Discussion