Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
ANTH 403 Gender Neutrality Rhetorical Analysis Paper
requirements: you to write a 10 page (double spaced) or 5-page single spaced paper)
1) You MUST cite three additional sources (peer-reviewed articles/chapters/books) that come from outside of course content. This means that you CANNOT count readings, films, or powerpoints for the course in your three-source minimum.
2) You MAY use readings, films, and powerpoints from class to bolster your argument.
3) You MUST cite all references – including course material and outside sources.
4) You can use any format that you like – but be sure that your writing is coherent and does not have typos (use spellcheck – it is a simple task and one that does wonders).
i will attach the content that you will base the paper off of below. I will also paste the link to one of the articles right here. The brave new age of gender-neutral kids – The Globe and Mail
there is also a video that i will paste the link to right here The Difference Between Men and Women – Video – Films On Demand (unlv.edu)
2 attachments
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
ANTH 403 Gender Neutrality Rhetorical Analysis Paper |
ANTH 403 Gender Neutrality Rhetorical Analysis Paper