Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Application of Health in All Policies and Ethical Issues
professor question: (based on students discussion question)
When thinking about public health past and present, what examples could you provide where collaboration did not lead to an ethical process?
PLEASE:
– minimum of 150 words or more
– strong academic writing / APA style (please use in-text citing and References at end )
– must be scholarly articles only no older than 5 years or website that is gov/ org. no blogs
– please be original writing ( will check for plagiarism ) and must answer all parts of question for full credit.
SEE BELOW classmate dissuasions question that professor asked question from
Health in All Policies (HiAP) is a collaborative approach to health-related issues, rights, and obligations. HiAP emphasizes the impact of public policies on health systems and the well-being of communities. Through Health in All Policies (HiAP), a healthy community framework is developed, through five critical processes, to address specific health issues facing a particular population. A healthy community framework considers the health implications of decisions made, seeks synergies, and avoids any harmful health impact on the community (Khayatzadeh-Mahani et al., 2019). Such a framework’s primary goal is to improve the health of the population and ensure equity while accessing healthcare services
The process of developing a healthy community framework should be evidence-based and ethical. Involving the community in assessing the root causes of problems is one way to ensure there is credible evidence (Pepin et al., 2017). Recommendations and actions are integrated to ensure the decisions made are reasonable and ethical. Participation from various groups and organizations in the community is also encouraged. Decision making and problem-solving are thus collaborative, making the process ethical.
The development of a healthy community framework incorporates five core processes, including Community/citizen engagement, multi-sectoral collaboration, political commitment, healthy public policy, and asset-based community development. The processes can be used in an environmental health issue such as air pollution to show the importance of collaborating with the community. Members of a community come in to help define the problem, suggest possible solutions, and evaluate overall success (Tomaziu-Todosia, 2020). For example, telling whether pollution has decreased. A multi-sectorial partnership among various departments is also vital to help in research and even funding. Governments are also involved to ensure a bottom-up and top-down approach. A healthy public policy is also an essential process, and the policy should not necessarily be developed by the health sector. For example, in air pollution, the specific community could agree to shut down the pollution source, maybe a factory. Asset-based community development means that the resources of a particular population are used. For example, experts may be used to determine the level of pollution. Natural resources in the community, such as geothermal power, could also replace fossil fuels.
To summarize, Health in All Policies (HiAP) emphasizes a healthy community and people. A framework is developed to create such a society. The framework considers the opinion, abilities of the people in a community and the resources available. The decisions made are thus ethical and ideal for solving health problems in a specific community.
Application of Health in All Policies and Ethical Issues
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Application of Health in All Policies and Ethical Issues |
Application of Health in All Policies and Ethical Issues