Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Applying Ethics to Personal and Professional Life Discussion
I’m working on a social science discussion question and need a sample draft to help me learn.
More than for many other professionals, public administrators face the daily challenge of balancing the ethics of personal and professional life. To perform their functions and duties, public administrators may have to carry out administrative actions that might collide with their personal or professional ethical beliefs. What would your personal ethical code of conduct dictate in the face of political or organizational policies that threaten personal liberties? What might help you frame your responsibilities in terms of protecting civil liberties while protecting all members of society?
For this Discussion, you choose a relevant category and topic of ethics that applies directly to your professional or volunteer concerns. Focus upon a decision that requires the application of ethical reasoning. This decision may be either private or public, be related to your current or future profession, involve either one individual or a large group, and be local or international.
To Prepare:
Note that Dr. Hana Callaghan’s (2020) article focuses on how voting requires ethical thinking in order to support that which represents “the good” in public policy.
Creating an ethical organization, says Dr. Kim Clark (Dean Emeritus, Harvard Business School), even if decisions are personally difficult, allows for the possibility of that organization to have an enormously beneficial impact on society and culture.
Select a social justice issue or concern that touches a professional organization in which you are a participant (e.g., employee, financial supporter, volunteer, etc.). The issue may be related to human rights, liberty, equality and equity, or a concern about justice. The matter may be private or public, affect a small or large group, and have either a local or an international reach.
Post your response to the following bullet points:
Describe social justice issue or concern and the people and/or organization (stakeholders) related to the issue. (Cooper, Step 1)
Discuss why the issue or concern is an ethical challenge. (Cooper, Step 2)
After briefly explaining the issue or concern, identify and propose two or three strategies you believe are necessary to resolve the issue or concern and why (Cooper (2012), Step 3, 4, and 5). Predict the likely consequences of each strategy. Finally, identify what you believe represents the best strategy, explaining why you think so.
Explain how your ethical decision is an affirmation of human rights, equity, liberty, and/or justice.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Applying Ethics to Personal and Professional Life Discussion |
Applying Ethics to Personal and Professional Life Discussion