Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
ART 104 Narrative Storytelling and Documentary Film
watch this
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hhMukP1dRQC52JZFq..
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ixvXrk8ZJqGtu-3Ovr6EUJkhhv2Xkp94/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qve3y1hdwDm68F0VfyeatjMSRYTEo8yG/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WoX5vJtJOFcyc4rsX6MsP4BwRa-zLr2x/view
and do these: Let’s discuss Alain Resnais’s oneiric meditations on mass murder, Night and Fog and Hiroshima, Mon Amour.
Choose at least one of the following example prompts plus a peer response prompt:
Discuss the topics for this week in dialog with the films: Genre, Documentary, and the Nouvelle Vague (choose one or more of the following prompts to write about):
Describe one or two ways that Resnais incorporates “narrative storytelling” into his documentary, Night and Fog.
Describe one or two ways that Resnais incorporates “documentary filmmaking” into his narrative, Hiroshima, Mon Amour.
What features of the Nouvelle Vague (French New Wave) did you notice in Hiroshima, Mon Amour?
What are some of the challenges to “documenting” catastrophic trauma that Resnais addresses in either/both film/(s).
Step Two: Post in the Class Discussion
Your post is worth 80 possible points
After you select a work of art, write and post a 550-750 word Formal Analysis (Visual Analysis) in which you describe and examine the form of the work of art, especially what the medium, visual elements, and principles of design contribute to its visual power and meaning. Organize your analysis into four paragraphs, listed below, and follow the instructions. Although not required, it may be helpful to use headings.
At the beginning of each paragraph, write a concise topic sentence that clearly states what the paragraph is about. This topic sentence will help frame the controlling argument for each paragraph and will help your reader follow your key ideas.
PARAGRAPH ONE: DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT
This paragraph should be between 150-200 words
Post an image of the work of art you are writing about.
In your topic sentence, clearly state the subject and/or identify the main issue, key theme, or narrative (story) the artist is working with. Do this in one sentence. Please note that in non-objective works, the primary subject can often be found among the visual elements or design principles (e.g. color, scale, etc.).
For example: “The Thinker, by French artist Auguste Rodin, is a sculpture of a pensive, yet powerful, male nude.”
Next, describe the overall work as you would to someone who hasn’t seen it. Paint a detailed picture with words. Your description should be so clear and specific that the reader can imagine the work of art in their mind as they read. Do not simply list what you see, but thoroughly describe the different areas of the work. Use lots of adjectives and avoid naming. Move from general to specific observations. If human figures are represented, describe their most dominant characteristics, including expressions, poses, gestures and how they are placed in relation to one another.
Remember, this is an opening paragraph and you can go into more depth about the medium in the second paragraph.
PARAGRAPH TWO: MEDIUM AND MATERIALS
This paragraph should be between 150-200 words.
In your topic sentence, summarize the artist’s unique approach to using their medium and materials to create their work. Do this in one sentence. Remember that this paragraph is about the physical process of making the work and not the visual elements or design principles.
For example: “Rodin’s expressive approach to modeling his sculpture makes the subject feel more human.”
Next, describe this unique approach in detail, and explain how it impacts, or is integral to, the viewer’s experience of the work. What is the artist trying to say or express by doing it this way? In other words, explain how this approach reinforces the message, theme, or narrative (story) in the work and contributes to making a powerful visual statement.
You must include 2-3 specific supporting observations from your chosen art object. Each sentence must be clear and descriptive.
PARAGRAPH THREE: COMPOSITION
This paragraph should be between 150-200 words.
In your topic sentence, clearly state the most dominant visual element or principle of design used to compose the work. Do this in one sentence. Please refer to this helpful Guide to the Visual Elements and Principles of Design.
For example: “Rodin’s exaggeration of the proportions of the hands and feet make the figure seem physically powerful when seen from below.” (In this example, “proportion” is a principle of design.)
Next, describe in rich detail how the artist used this specific visual element or principle of design to organize the work of art. How did the artist’s use of this element or principle underpin the composition and/or become an integral part of what the artist was trying to say or express? In other words, explain how it reinforces the message, theme, or narrative (story) in the work and contributes to making a powerful visual statement.
You must include 2-3 specific supporting observations from your chosen art object. Each sentence must be clear and descriptive.
PARAGRAPH FOUR: EVALUATION
This paragraph should be between 100-150 words
In your topic sentence, briefly summarize whether or not you think the work of art was effective or successful, and why. Do this in one sentence. After writing the previous three paragraphs, you should be better able to interpret and understand the work of art.
For example: “In The Thinker, Rodin successfully depicts a man who thinks deeply, yet has the physical power to act.”
Next, analyze your own reaction to the work of art and evaluate its effectiveness in more detail. You will explain the reasons why you think the work is successful and support your reasoning with 2-3 direct references to the work of art you selected.
You may wish to consider the following:
What initial ideas or feelings come to mind after experiencing the work of art?
Do you identify with the work? Based on your life experiences, is it personally relevant to you?
What is it about the work of art that you like the most? The message? The way it was made or composed?
Are you engaged by the formal characteristics, such as the way the artist used light, color, texture, space, scale, etc?
Do you think your experience of the work is the same as what the artist intended?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
ART 104 Narrative Storytelling and Documentary Film |
ART 104 Narrative Storytelling and Documentary Film