Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Article Discussion on Distributive Negotiation Arbitration Strategy and Personal Outcomes
Each student will choose a keyterm from the list below.
DISTRIBUTIVE NEGOTIATION WAS SELECTED AS A KEYTERM.
The following information must be included in the following format, as well as supplementary instructions at the bottom of your application (feedback from last asst)
DEFINITION: a brief definition of the main phrase followed by the term’s APA reference; this does not count toward the word count.
SUMMARY: Write a summary of the article in your own words that is between 150 and 200 words long. Make a note of the article’s author, their qualifications, and why we should believe his or her ideas, research, or discoveries about the key term.
ANALYSIS: In 300-350 words, give a brief analysis of how the article relates to the selected chapter Key Term in your own words. An analysis is an opportunity for you to add value by expressing your experiences, thoughts, and opinions, rather than rehashing what was already expressed in the article. This is the most crucial aspect of the project.
REFERENCES: All references must be given in APA format at the bottom of the submission.
Make care to use the headers in your submission to verify that all of the assignment’s requirements are met.
Plagiarism in any form, including cutting and pasting, will result in a grade of zero for the whole assignment.
NOTE: ARTICLE ATTACHED
feedback from the previous journal
The following is the information that students must supply in order to complete the component: –
(1) Information such as the author’s degree, such as a PhD.
(2) What is the author’s role in the story? Do they collaborate with a university or college? What is their affiliation/department, and how does it connect to the keyword? They collaborate with the Economics department, for example, and their article is about Economics.
(3) The number of articles on the key phrase that the writers have authored/coauthored and published in journals. #3 is missing from your delivery. How many other journal articles has this person authored or co-authored that have been published? The major method we can say we can lend weight to the authors is by publishing other authored/co-
Article Discussion on Distributive Negotiation Arbitration Strategy and Personal Outcomes
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Article Discussion on Distributive Negotiation Arbitration Strategy and Personal Outcomes |
Article Discussion on Distributive Negotiation Arbitration Strategy and Personal Outcomes