Assessment and Site Characterization Discussion
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Elements of Site Assessment and Site Characterization Discussion
I’m working on a science discussion question and need a reference to help me understand better.
For items 1-3, write at least 100 words each. For item 4, your comment/reply to a classmate will be separate, write atleast 50 words total to two classmates (remember to be thoughtful, positive, and constructive).
Note: Do NOT copy and paste. It is considered plagiarism. Use your own words. Cite your sources.
DB Topics:
From Characterization and Monitoring of Pollutants presentation: Describe the purpose and the elements of SiteAssessment and Site Characterization. You may have to do additional research.
From Characterization and Monitoring of Pollutants presentation: Explain USACE Conceptual Site Model (CSM). Provide
reasons and an example for one of the steps of the process.
From Characterization and Monitoring of Pollutants presentation and additional files: Describe sample access and sample collection tools used for soil sample collection. Select one of the collection tools from the sampling matrix and
provide a detailed explanation of the tool (Include media, depth, validation and relative cost per sample.
Peer review. Comment to at least one classmate’s post. With professional courtesy, provide additional analysis,
constructive criticism, and additional facts and solutions. I want to see a paragraph of 50 words or more. (Note the word
counter in the lower right corner of your posting window).
NOTE: Cite your sources you use for your discussion board posts either at the end of each item or at the end of your post.Elements of Site Assessment and Site Characterization Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Assessment and Site Characterization Discussion
Assessment and Site Characterization Discussion