Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Assignment on Juvenile Justice (CRJ201)
Unit 3’s due date is Sunday at 11:59 p.m. EST. 100 points Overview of the Situation Students must read the In re Winship case (397 US 358- Supreme Court 1970) as part of this brief assignment. These rulings were watershed moments in our legal history, resulting in changes in our case law. These exercises allow you to examine the case from the perspective of one of the nine justices and reach your own conclusions. Instructions:
Create a case brief using the template.
US Supreme Court brief in the In re Winship case, 397 US 358, 1970. In the unit’s readings and resources section, there is a link to the case.
o In the seventh phase, the “analytical section,” imagine yourself as one of the nine justices and explain your conclusion.
Requirements:
Submit the Case Brief Template in its entirety. A minimum of two resources
Before you start writing, read the criteria below to see how your work will be judged, and then read them again when you’ve finished.
Juvenile Justice (CRJ201)
Brief Description of the Situation
Rubric for Case Brief Assignment Evaluation
DEFICIENT CRITERIA REQUIRES IMPROVEMENT
Exceptional performance
Points range from 0 to 44. Points range from 45 to 59. a score of 60 to 74 a score of 75 The content does not include
the required topic; statements are not backed up with proof; the article is severely lacking in depth and detail.
Does not adequately address the assigned topic; statements are only sporadically supported by evidence.
The themes are adequately covered, and the majority of assertions are backed up by proof.
Provides in-depth coverage of the subjects, with assertions backed up by evidence.
a range of 0 to 5 points 7 out of 10 points Points: 89 10 out of 10 Resources 0 resources are available 2 resources from 1 source two or more
resources
a range of 0 to 8 points Points: 911 1214 point range Points: 15 APA Format and Clear and Professional Writing
Professional presentation is hampered by errors, and norms are not followed.
Significant blunders that do not detract from the professionalism of the presentation.
There are a few faults that do not detract from a professional presentation.
Clear, professional, APA-compliant, and error-free writing and formatting.
Overview:sInstructions:
Requirements:
Evaluation Case Brief Assignment Rubric
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Assignment on Juvenile Justice |
Assignment on Juvenile JusticeAssignment on Juvenile Justice