Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Assignment on public health writing
Hello, I have a mini-essay due this Sunday (May 30) at 11:59 p.m. for Medical Anthropology (pacific standard). The word count ranges from 400 to 500 words. I’ve provided the rubric, prompt, and lecture slides, all of which will assist you in answering the question.
The question is:
Because this is a brief assignment, it should not necessitate extensive research beyond reading a detailed news story. In your own words, describe an instance of medicine and political conflict (it could be from something discussed in class or your own, e.g. Nepal, Bahrain, Syria, Egypt, Palestine, Turkey, Sudan, Ethiopia, Afghanistan, on the US-Mexico border). Describe how the ideals of “medical impartiality” and “medical immunity” have been broken or are being threatened. Make certain your sources are trustworthy! Reflect on how this case has changed your perspective on the role of health care practitioners in politics using the analytical tools from the readings and lectures.
Rubric for Writing a Mini Essay
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Assignment on public health writing |
Assignment on public health writing