Autism Spectrum Disorder Article Review
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Autism Spectrum Disorder Article Review
Paper 2 (word file):
On a (ONE) current research article (original research, article will be organized as Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) on the selected hormone (same as the hormone in paper 1). Sections (format) of your paper, other than the title and literature cited –
(1) Introduction that states the headings of the sections of the content,
(2) Content that is organized into sections and subsections (combine information from the introduction, methods, results and discussion of the article into the subsection corresponding to it), and contains the information in the research article (format of your paper-2 is the same as that of paper-1) (include figures in the article), and
(3) Conclusion that states the main information in each of the subsections/sections of the content and provides a thesis (of the article) and an original thought (yours).
The selection of the article (its breadth and depth) is critical to the quality of your paper.
Essential:
-adapt the figures to create your own adaptation of the figure
-Must be a research article, can’t use a review article, book chapter, online (non-article) information
-Must be thorough/complete
-must be organized
-must show that you understand the information
-cite source(s) completely (provide link(s) below the citation)
Checklist Paper 2:
Article= a (ONE) research article, will be organized as Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion sections. The quality/thoroughness of your paper depends on the depth of the article you select
Paper has 3 main parts (Introduction, content, and conclusion) in bold, centered
Introduction, lists the headings/subheadings in Content section
Content, the headings (of sections) are in bold/italics; the subheadings (of subsections) are underlined
No plagiarism, written in your own words. The verbatim sentences, authors words, are within quotations
(a) adapted the figure(s) in article to create your own adaptations of the figure(s), (b) placed in quotes (quotations) the original figure (as in article), below your created figure
Paper is thorough/complete, all of the info in the article is present in the paper
Conclusion, states the main information, in one sentence each, of each of the sections/subsections of the content.
Conclusion, provides a thesis (of the article) and an original thought (yours). Use the word thesis in stating the theses, and give the specifics instead of general statements.
Autism Spectrum Disorder Article Review
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow