Biology and Society History of Double Helix Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Biology and Society History of Double Helix Discussion
I need an explanation for this Biology question to help me study.
(1) State whether you would write an internal or an external history of the double helix with the letters discovered at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
(2) Then, explain why by describing BOTH:
(a) An aspect of either change over time or context in your chosen historical realm (internal or external) that interests you by making clear references to the details in Module 1, Lecture 1 and/or Gann & Witkowski (2010); AND
(b) How specific details found in the letters relate to your understanding of this aspect of change over time or context in the history of the double helix.
How You Think that History Intersects with Biology Discussion
How you think that history intersects with Biology. Reply with minimum of 50 words to 2 of your peers.
Post 1
For as long as humans have been alive, they have sought to gain more knowledge of themselves and the world they exist in. History and biology intersect at the point where biology, or rather all science, moves forward while looking to the past. All experimentation and discovery lead with focusing on past problems and what has not worked yet to solve those problems. Early medical doctors had to look back and realize that the practices of their ancestors were not sufficient, or incomplete, to tackle the current issue they faced in their present time. In modern times, looking back on the problems with infections led to the discovery of infection-causing bacteria and the development of sterilizing agents to keep operating rooms in hospitals clean.
Post 2
There are many ways to approach this prompt, which is quite frustrating but I think that history and biology are tightly intertwined subjects. We can study the history of biology through the study of evolution, the study of geology and radiometric dating, along with many other types of studies. Biology, or rather the study of biology has been noted throughout history, long before the idea of evolution was proposed. Despite the creationist mode of thought, people have noticed similarities between species and/or other interesting natural phenomena. Within the study of geology, the formation of rocks/structures is highly impacted by biological factors, in which these studies can tell us lots about the biology the existed in the past (biological history).
Biology and Society History of Double Helix Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow