biology labs excel
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Question Description
here i will upload to you the lecture”s power-point and i will need you to do three things
1-the lab graph which is stated in the slides all the thing you need to do.
2- the second attachment which is the graph excel workbook which is explained withen the file itself.
3- complete this file which is pretty self explanatory. ( evaluating and presenting )
2. What is the name of publication this article (that you just read) was written for? What type of publication is it?
3. The article reports on a link between what?
4. Is the link reported on an association/correlation, or does it identify causality?5. Where was the study published? What is the name of one of its authors?
6. Who funded the study? Spell out the name.
7. Was this a manipulative or observational study?
8. What was the total sample size? How many women miscarried? How many women had normal deliveries?
9. How many women who miscarried who had the flu vaccine in the 28 days before the miscarriage (and had also been immunized the previous year)? What percentage was that? Do you think this is a high percentage10. How many women who had normal deliveries who had the flu vaccine in the 28 days before delivery (and had also been immunized the previous year)? What percentage was that?
11. The authors said that the results could be biased if what?
12. Is this new link supported by previous studies? What did most previous studies indicate?
13. Do the studys authors along with the CDC and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists – recommend that pregnant women get the flu vaccine? Why?
14. Is this reflected in the articles title?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow biology labs excel
biology labs excel