Blockchain challenges legal solutions to defamation
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
blockchain challenges legal solutions to defamation
Topic: How the blockchain challenges legal solutions to defamation
Paper details:
Blockchain challenges legal solutions to defamation
I would like a paper which covers what blockchain technology means for inaccurate information being published on it. While this article will likely also apply to things like IP infringement (e.g. hosting the latest blockbuster movies on a blockchain) and privacy (e.g. addresses, bank details, revenge porn), the paper should focus
on defamatory content in particular and explain the following points, likely with comparisons to standard hosting protocols. What is a blockchain? How is content hosted on a blockchain? How can content on a blockchain be accessed? How can content on a blockchain be removed? What jurisdiction does content on a
blockchain fall under? Who is accountable for content on a blockchain? What does this mean for lawyers attempting to remove content hosted on a blockchain? Possibly What is a DAO? What is a Smart Contract? Where necessary from the point of view of EU law vs US.
Blockchain challenges legal solutions to defamation
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Blockchain challenges legal solutions to defamation