Bloom’s Taxonomy for Developing
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
A Comparison of Planetary Sizes
JC – Qualitative Methods – Research Group 7
From PSYC 209 – 1638
No unread replies.
No replies.
Read: Qualitative article – Grandmother and healthcare professional breastfeeding perspectives
Write: Your article summary, following the Article Summary Guidelines
Ask: 3 Critical Questions
Bloom’s Taxonomy for Developing Questions
Analysis
Examine and break information into parts by identifying motives or causes. Make inferences and find evidence to support generalizations.
Key Words
Analyze Contrast Function Simplify
Assumption Discover Inference Survey
Categorize Dissect Inspect Take part in
Classify Distinguish List Test for
Compare Divide Motive Theme
Conclusion Examine Relationships
Questions
How is ____ related to ….?
Why do you think …?
What motive is there …?
What inference can you make…?
What is the function of …?
How would you classify…?
What ideas justify…?
Evaluation
Present and defend opinions by making judgments about information, validity of ideas or quality of work based on a set of criteria.
Key Words
Agree Decide Importance Prioritize
Appraise Deduct Influence Prove
Assess Defend Interpret Rate
Award Determine Judge Recommend
Choose Disprove Justify Rule on
Compare Dispute Mark Select
Conclude Estimate Measure Support
Criteria Evaluate Opinion Value
Criticize Explain Perceive
Questions
How would you prove…? disprove…?
Can you assess the value or importance of …?
Would it be better if…?
What would you recommend …?
How would you rate the …?
How could you determine…?
How would you prioritize…?
How would you justify…?
How would you compare the ideas…? people…?
Synthesis/Create
Compile information together in a different way by combining elements in a new pattern or proposing alternative solutions.
Key Words
Adapt Discuss Original
Build Elaborate Originate
Change Estimate Plan
Choose Formulate Predict
Combine Happen Propose
Compile Imagine Solution
Compose Improve Solve
Construct Invent Suppose
Create Make up Test
Delete Maximize Theorize
Design Minimize
Develop Modify
Questions
What changes would you make to solve…?
How would you improve …?
Can you elaborate on the reason…?
Can you propose an alternative …?
How would you adapt _____ to create a different …?
How would you estimate the results for …?
Reply: To 1 groupmate’s critical question. You must provide support to your answer by citing a source using APA style.
Article Summary guidelines
Article Summary & 3 Critical Question Guidelines
Purpose: This assignment acquaints you with reading a scientific article and with scientific writing. Being able to read and properly summarize scientific articles will help you when you write papers, research proposals, and lab reports in other psychology classes.
SECTION A: WHAT YOU NEED AND WHERE TO GET IT
1. The Research Articles to use for this Homework Assignment
· You can find these articles on Canvas. It is posted in the weekly Module under READ as well as in the assignment body.
2. Information on Scientific Style and How to Write a Summary
· The Psychology Writing Center
· (Links to an external site.)
· at University of Washington has several downloadable PDFs, including this one about summarizing a research article
· (Links to an external site.) https://psych.uw.edu/storage/writing_center/summarizing.pdf
· .
· APA formatting help can be found in this SCC Library guide
· Actions
· or from OWL At Purdue
· (Links to an external site.)
·
SECTION B: IF YOU NEED HELP
Bruce McKenna Writing Center at SCC
· Writing Center staff can discuss APA style, help you organize your ideas, and give you feedback on the clarity of your rough draft and citations. During campus closure, the writing center will be providing writing assistance via email. Students can send their essay drafts with instructions attached to MiSun.Bishop@seattlecolleges.edu
· Students should allow roughly 1-3 business days for a response, depending on different traffic times throughout the quarter.
My Virtual Office Hours: Let’s set up a time to chat through Canvas or video call on Zoom to discuss your draft!
SECTION C: PROCEDURE FOR WRITING YOUR SUMMARY
1. Read the article. Identify key points: the research topic, purpose and hypotheses (if any), what was done, the results, and how the researchers interpreted the results. Highlighting or underlining these points as you read will help you find them more easily when you write. Here are my tips for making your way through a science journal article:
· Read the abstract. This is a 150-ish word summary of the whole paper. Every single sentence in an abstract is informative.
· Read the introduction. This is the beginning of the paper. In the introduction, authors discuss the theory behind their research, previous research findings, and their hypotheses. The intro might have subheadings. Read this introduction section thoroughly.
· Read the methods section paying particular attention to the participants and procedure sections.
· Just skim the results section. Unless you have already taken a statistics course, you probably don’t want to read things like t(2, 67) = 4.68, p<.05.
· Read the discussion section thoroughly.This is where the authors will tell you in English what they learned from their study.
2. Write the summary. The summary should be a condensed version of the article, not an abstract (abstracts are more concise). Avoid “lifting” sentences from the article. Use your own words. You will lose points for using quotes. MAKE SURE that you properly cite the authors of the assigned article using APA citation style at least once within your summary (SEE EXAMPLES AT THE END OF THIS HANDOUT).
· Your summary should be 1 page to 1.5 pages in length (no more, no less), DOUBLE-SPACED, Font Size 12. Margins should be 1.25″ at the top, bottom, left and right.
4. Try to follow these General Length Guidelines, within the overall 1 to 1.5 page limit:
Approximate number of sentences per topic:
· 2-4: Background (Describe the context for the study.)
· 1-2: Specific purpose(s) of the study
· 4-7: Method (Who and how many participated? What variables were examined? What was the research design – in other words, what “conditions” or “groups” were compared, if any? What was the procedure—what did the participants and researchers do?
· 2-5: Results (Describe the key findings.)
· 2-4 Discussion (According to the authors…. What do the results mean? What are the implications of the findings? What are the limitations of the study? What are future directions for this research topic?)
5. Write 3 critical questions about the article that your classmates will answer. These questions should not be merely fact-based or for clarity on the research paper. They should spur discussion and deeper thought. Use “Bloom’s Taxonomy for Developing Questions” for assistance.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!