Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
BUS 1101 Business Ethics Research Discussion Question
I’m working on a business discussion question and need guidance to help me learn.
You work for an entertainment company located in Dallas, Texas. Your boss has told you that the company has hired an accounting firm to value the assets of the company. You look at the company books and realize something might be wrong with the asset valuation made by the accounting firm.
But you’re not sure, since you’re not an accountant. You realize that if the stock price goes up in the next 6 months, you will get a very nice bonus. You talk to your boss about your discovery.
Her response was odd. What, if anything, should you do? Why? When responding to this topic find sources with knowledge of business ethics. Find researchers, writers, or practitioners in the field who write about business ethics or who advise businesses on ethics. Refer to these experts by name as you respond to the topic.
Explain where the articles were located (for example, Forbes” or the Wall Street Journal), who the experts are, and what the experts say about the topic. Don’t simply respond with an opinion. What did the expert advise you about this situation?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
BUS 1101 Business Ethics Research Discussion Question |
BUS 1101 Business Ethics Research Discussion Question