Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
BUS241 Coca Cola Corporate Responsibility Programs Reaction
Directions:
Begin working on Reaction Paper II “Corporate Responsibility Programs”
100 Best Corporate Citizens (Links to an external site.)
CRO’s Top 100 Corporate Citizens 2018 (Links to an external site.)
As You Sow: Corporate Social Responsibility (Links to an external site.)
Starbucks: Corporate Social Responsibility (Links to an external site.)
The Coca-Cola Company: Protecting the Environment (Links to an external site.)
Merck: Corporate Responsibility (Links to an external site.)
More ways to find sources have been listed below:
Mergent Online: Links to an external site.Mergent Online delivers a comprehensive suite of financial and company information, providing access to one of the most complete historical financial databases with just a few mouse clicks.
Factiva: Links to an external site.Factiva, a Dow Jones & Reuters Company, provides essential business news and information. Factiva’s unrivaled collection of more than 10,000 authoritative sources includes the exclusive combination ofThe Wall Street Journal, theFinancial Times, Dow Jones and Reuters and the Associated Press newswires.
Business Source Complete: Links to an external site.Business Source Complete is a comprehensive article database offering access to trade magazines and scholarly journals, including Forbes and Harvard Business Review.
Lexis Nexis: Links to an external site.Lexis Nexis is NOVA’s primary database for legal information. It is widely used in the legal profession for information about cases. While it can be used to find information on US case law, Lexis Nexis also provides access to national and international business newspapers (by searching in the Search the News box) and company information (by searching in the Get Company Info box).
Describe a corporate responsibility
What the company thinks they gain by engaging in it?
How the employees feel about the program?
Do you think the company should be doing this program at all?
Grading:
This assignment is worth up to 100 points towards your final grade. See the grading criteria below.
CATEGORY | Full Marks 25 to >23 pts | Partial Marks 23 to >15 pts | Minor Marks 15 to >0 pts | No Marks 0 pts |
Quality of Information | Information clearly relates to the main topic.
It includes several supporting details and/or examples. |
Information clearly relates to the main topic.
It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples. |
Information clearly relates to the main topic.
No details and/or examples are given. |
Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic. |
Amount of Information | All topics are addressed and all questions answered with at least 2 sentences about each. | All topics are addressed and most questions answered with at least 2 sentences about each. | All topics are addressed, and most questions answered with 1 sentence about each. | One or more topics were not addressed. |
Paragraph Construction | All paragraphs include introductory sentence, explanations or details, and concluding sentence. | Most paragraphs include introductory sentence, explanations or details, and concluding sentence. | Paragraphs included related information but were typically not constructed well. | Paragraphing structure was not clear and sentences were not typically related within the paragraphs. |
Sources | All sources and works cite dare accurately documented in the MLA format. | All sources and works cited are accurately documented, but a few are not in the Malformity. | All sources and works cited are accurately documented, but many are not in the MLA format. | Some sources are not accurately documented and not in the MLA format. |
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
BUS241 Coca Cola Corporate Responsibility Programs Reaction |
BUS241 Coca Cola Corporate Responsibility Programs Reaction