Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Case From The Lens Of Ethical And Moral Principles
Provide your analysis of the case from the lens of ethical and moral principles. Responses to your group members’ posts will prompt further examination of the case.
These cases put a spotlight on issues of disability, informed consent, and family, including the different ways individuals, even within the same family, assess what makes a life worth living. Other issues that emerge are medical discrimination that allegedly led to the death of their loved ones. There are several articles to guide your reading and videos for added insight into these two cases.
Readings:
The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part I: The Hippocratic Oath from antiquity to modern times. EditEditDownload The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part I: The Hippocratic Oath from antiquity to modern times.
As you read the assigned ethical/moral dilemma case for your group:
Examine and discuss as a group the ethical dilemma using the main principles of ethics, the framework for decision-making: respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice (Belmont Report, 1979). Include in your analysis a discussion of the failures of these four principles and the implications of lack of informed consent.
Additionally, discuss the assigned case considering ethical violations of medicine that directly harmed the patient and disregard codes of medical and moral values Hippocratic Oath. To do so, examine whether the general ethical and moral values of the Hippocratic Oath were violated or alternatively, justified. Explain.
Provide a reflection on the ethical and moral dilemma case study.
Although responses to the other group’s discussion is not mandatory, it is encouraged that you examine the other ethical and moral dilemma case because both represent valid concerns with the medical community and serious disregard for human dignity and value of life.
Group 2
‘It’s Genocide’: Family Alleges Ominous Conclusion in Seeking Answers to Their Daughter’s Death Download ‘It’s Genocide’: Family Alleges Ominous Conclusion in Seeking Answers to Their Daughter’s Death
Scott Schara: Pfizer Drugs & Medical Malpractice Killed His Daughter Grace EditDownload Scott Schara: Pfizer Drugs & Medical Malpractice Killed His Daughter Grace
Our Amazing Grace (Links to an external site.) Our Amazing Grace: News Release – World Wide Genocide
Grace Schara—an inquisitive young woman with Down-Syndrome—died a tragic and preventable death at a Wisconsin hospital. Rather than using treatments proven to combat COVID-19, Ascension’s St. Elizabeth’s Hospital followed the U.S. government’s ineffective COVID-19 treatment protocols, for which they reap significant financial rewards. On the final day of Grace’s life, as her doctor assured her parents she was doing well, Dr. Gavin Shokar also “unilaterally labeled Grace a DNR and ordered a lethal combination of IV sedatives and narcotics”—a fatal combination of the drugs Precedex, Lorazepam, and Morphine—which were administered over an incredibly short period of time.
Case From The Lens Of Ethical And Moral Principles
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|