Challenge in Typing Quest Discussion Replies Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Challenge in Typing Quest Discussion Replies Assignment
Unit 2 Discussion – Challenge(s) in Typing Quest
1414 unread replies.1515 replies.
Directions
Please make sure you address each question listed below and that all posts are of value, adding information or insight to the topic being discussed.
Replies of “I agree” or “that is a good post” do not qualify as substantive responses. Posts should be made on 3 different days each week to receive full credit. Your initial response should be posted by 11:59 p.m. CST on Wednesday and at least two secondary responses to others’ posts should be made by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. CST.
The instructor will be interacting with you each week regarding your discussion post. You are encouraged to interact with the instructor, but please ensure that you also interact with at least two of your classmates to receive full credit. Please note that posts should only be made during the actual week of the discussion–no early or late posts will be accepted.
Your response must be more than one sentence.
Discussion Prompt(s)
Your ability to conduct yourself with integrity will be a key to your success in your chosen career as a student and future professional in the health care field. Having integrity in the face of challenges is a remarkable trait. What are you finding challenging about the Typing Quest program at this point?
REPLY TO
I am enjoying Tying Quest for the most part. The instructions are very clear and easy to understand. The thing I have struggled with is that I am getting distracted while doing it. I feel like its the same steps, which causes me to get a little bored and distracted easily. I have to make sure that even though it has been easy to follow, that this class is one I do after my son is in bed. If I try to do it while he is awake I become to distracted and then my WPM starts to decline.
The challenges that I face with TypingQuest is at first I could not get in but then I did. I do think I have a challenge with setting my fingers right. I got the hang of it but it all takes practice and time to get better it.
I love the typing quest program. It’s nothing hard about it. It gives direct instructions if you read and do things step by step you will have no problem with completing any of the lessons. I think that there is double work in a way because it’s very repetitive. At the end of the day its teaching you the correct way to type. I enjoy it.
Challenge in Typing Quest Discussion Replies Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow