Challenge of Ensuring Food Quality
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Challenge of Ensuring Food Quality
Address the bulleted items in 200 to 250 words or more. Use additional research to support your answers and remember to cite your sources. Then respond to at least two classmate’s posts.
As a business I want to know what are the basic expectations for my product or service. Where do I go to know what these standards are? Organizations many non-profits have been established to provide the requirements, specifications, guidelines, or characteristics of a product or service. An example is the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Standards from this and other organizations consider governmental regulations materials used, products produced, processes applied, and services that are suitable the intended purpose.
Base you post on the following:
- Watch:
The Challenge of Ensuring Food Quality in a Growing Complex Food Supply Chain video https://youtu.be/tURAsK9g4JY
- Go to the following web page and explore some of these organizations:
IBR STANDARDS HOSTED BY ANSI
https://ibr.ansi.org/Standards/
- Find a specific standards organization you are interested in. It can be different than the ones on the website.
- Give a description of this organization
- Discuss specifically
- Where do these standards come from?
- Does this organization offer other services?
- How do they help their industry maintain quality?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results