Champion of the World Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Champion of the World Essay
READ for reference:
Angelou’s “Champion of the World”
Tan’s “Fish Cheeks”
Write a paper emulating the same writing a narrative in the style as Tan and Angelou. By style, I mean such things as voice, structure and building tension. Your subject, of course, will be different.
Write about an early event or incident in school that made you realize, perhaps for the first time, that there is a difference between males and females. It could be a childhood experience you had with a teacher, a classmate or a principal. Use the most interesting story you can remember. As this is a narration paper, embellish and exaggerate some points if necessary. In fact a narration paper is the only paper that you can totally make up if you want!
Read what makes a good story in Bedford. Remember, an effective story telling method has you one way at the beginning, then something happens through conflict to change your perception. The end of the story must be the realization that through this event you realized for the first time that there was obvious cultural and/or societal differences between males and females. Do not write staements like “this was when I learned the difference between male and female” in your stories! Like the essays you read this week, the message is implied through the events in the story.
Five pages
MLA heading. (Watch tutorials to see how all papers must look)\
Written communication (50 points)
- Organization (25 points)
- Inadequate: There appears to be no organization of the essay’s contents.
- Needs Improvement: Organization of the essay is difficult to follow, due to inadequate transitions and/or rambling format.
- Adequate: The essay can be easily followed. A combination of the following is apparent: Basic transitions are used; a structured format is used.
- Professional quality: The essay can be easily followed. A combination of the following is apparent: Effective transitions are used; a professional format is used.
- Mechanics and grammar (25 Points)
- Inadequate: Sentences and paragraphs are difficult to read and understand due to poor grammar or mechanics
- Needs improvement: The essay contains numerous grammatical and mechanical errors.
- Adequate: The essay contains minimal grammatical or mechanical errors.
- Professional quality: The essay is clear and concise and contains no grammatical or mechanical errors.
Content (50 points)
- Correctness of facts (25 points)
- Inadequate: Most facts are wrong.
- Needs improvement: Some facts are wrong.
- Adequate: Technical details are generally correct.
- Professional quality: All facts are correct, and the technical explanation is both concise and complete.
- Completeness (25 points)
- Inadequate: Did not address the prompt.
- Needs improvement: Addressed the prompt, but provided few details.
- Adequate: Address the prompt, but left out some details.
- Professional quality: Addressed the prompt completely.
Champion of the World Essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow