Charles Darwin and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck Dialogue on Evolution
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Charles Darwin and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck Dialogue on Evolution
Assignment: Contributions to Modern Theories of Evolution
Like evolution itself, it took many mind years and countless minds to arrive at our modern theory of evolution. In this assignment, you will create a dialogue between two scientists who made significant contributions to our understanding of evolution.
Charles Darwin and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck Dialogue on Evolution
Instructions
Your task is to select two scientists who made significant contributions to modern theories of evolution and to create a fictional dialogue between the individuals. The dialogue may be written as a transcript of a phone call, a series of written letters, e-mails, texts, or even social media postings. The dialogue should include the following:
The main idea or theory of your selected scientists.
Any evidence or relevant examples that support the theory or ideas of your selected scientists.
How the ideas of the selected scientists advanced or furthered the understanding of evolution at the time.
Regardless of the format you choose to use, your dialogue should include three main exchanges between your selected scientists where they are discussing their theories on evolution. There is no maximum word count; however, you should aim to have each scientist use 50 words for these main exchanges. As an estimate, your two scientists should exchange 300 words across their three main exchanges in their conversation.
Charles Darwin and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck Dialogue on Evolution
NOTE
You are encouraged to be creative with this assignment. Consider using images, where appropriate, to connect to your scientist’s dialogue. Although you are expected to use the proper scientific terminology and present factual information, you can make your scientists talk as one would on social media the 21st century.
Word limits are provided to give you some guidance as to the general expectation. You may go above (or below) the suggested guidelines. Your submission will be graded on the quality of the exchanges, including your understanding and application of the various theories on evolution, rather than the word total.
Scientists
You may select from the following list of scientists for this assignment:
Charles Lyell
Thomas Malthus
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck
Mary Leakey
Charles Darwin
Stephen Jay Gould
Niles Eldredge
Mary Anning
Assessment Details
Your submission should include the following:
Your dialogue, in your selected format, between your two scientists.
Charles Darwin and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck Dialogue on Evolution
Charles Darwin and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck Dialogue on Evolution
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|
Charles Darwin and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck Dialogue on Evolution
Charles Darwin and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck Dialogue on Evolution