Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Make a note of the film you watched and the comedy star who appeared in it. Provide specific examples, such as Time Stamps from specific scenes in your movie.
1. Consider how your film might metaphorically or literally reflect the society of the 1920s. Is it aimed at the hardworking “man” on the street or the “American dreamer”? Does it include some of the excitement, as well as some of the problems and chaos that come with modernization? Maybe it has a theme of a traditional American value? Is there any evidence of “the new woman” or immigration? These are just a few suggestions. Even if your film is set in a different era, such as the Civil War or the Alaskan Gold Rush, why do you think its theme will resonate with people from the 1920s?
and
3. Visualize: Consider what you would consider an interesting visual moment in the movie. (It doesn’t have to be the most thrilling, hilarious, or heartbreaking.) What is it about this scene that appeals to you visually? How did the filmmaker come up with that eye-catching visual? Don’t just concentrate on the plot; include elements of the film’s technique, such as how the comedic or dramatic moment is created, the star’s talent, the camera’s use, what’s going on in the background, and so on.
TO REFERENCE THE POINTS IN THE FILM YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT, USE 3-4 TIME STAMPS.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Charlie Chaplin’s City Lights 1931 film review |
Charlie Chaplin’s City Lights 1931 film review