Chemistry in the Real World Project
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Chemistry in the Real World Project
Chemistry in the Real World Project: Draft
About the DraftThe second deliverable for your Chemistry in the Real World Project is the draft.
At this point, you should have completed the activity that you identified in your proposal. If you planned to administer a survey, the survey should be complete. If you planned to critique a journal article, the critique should be complete. Etc. You should be in the polishing phase. The purpose of this deliverable is to communicate the results of your project to your instructor and to allow you the opportunity to demonstrate mastery of specific Module Objectives and Course Learning Outcomes through meaningful reflection. See the Chemistry in the Real World Project page for further details on this project.
The draft should include the following details:
Project Presentation: Share your actual project with your instructor. If you were performing a critique of a
journal article, share the critique. If you performed an interview, share the interview questions, the responses,
and your reflection on the activity. Etc.
Project Timeline: Identify the milestones from your proposal (edits are acceptable), clearly indicating which
have been accomplished and when. Also, indicate the anticipated completion date of remaining project
milestones.
Key Vocabulary: At least 10 relevant vocabulary words, with definitions, in your own words
Module Connection: Several paragraphs describing meaningful connections between your project and the
textbook content, Module Objectives, and/or Course Learning Outcomes. Simply listing objectives and
outcomes is not sufficient.
Real World Connection: A description of the meaningful connections between your project and your academic/professional career and/or personal life
References: Formatted consistently in the same style, such as APAThis project will assess your critical thinking, scientific literacy, and information literacy. In the execution and presentation of your project, you are expected to:
properly research the topic you select, evaluating sources for credibility and bias before using them to support your position
develop a clear position (ALL project can take a position reach out to your instructor if you get stuck here)
integrate evidence from various sources to form a scientific argument
bridge information from the theoretical to the real world (module to your project and project to your personal/academic/professional life)Tips for Success:
Reach out to your instructor for mentoring and support. Ask specific questions.
Start early.
Use the rubric to pre-grade yourself. Adjust your work accordingly.Remember: Reports are not an accepted deliverable. You should not expect to simply research a subject and write a report.
Formatting
Written deliverables must be formatted as follows: Use 12-point, Times New Roman font, double-spaced. Include a cover page, section headers (and sub-headers as appropriate), and page numbers. All submissions should be saved using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.
Chemistry in the Real World Project
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Chemistry in the Real World Project
Chemistry in the Real World Project