Chief Purchasing Officer Project Assignment Assignment

March 22, 2022

Chief Purchasing Officer Project Assignment Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Chief Purchasing Officer Project Assignment Assignment

In this project students will illustrate their understanding of the course material by designing an organizational structure for the purchasing operations of a healthcare manufacturer. The students will apply key concepts from the course to demonstrate their understanding of the purchasing strategies organizations use to maximize operational efficiencies within the purchasing sector. In fairness to majority of students, no late assignments will be accepted, unless prior arrangements have been made with Instructor.

You are now the company’s Chief Purchasing Officer. This company has worldwide operations located at 55 buying locations. It has five major business groups involved in the design and manufacture of healthcare products (precision surgical tools, blood-testing devices, etc.). Currently, purchasing operates in a very decentralized manner.

Your goal is to design an organizational structure that will allow you to enact value-adding strategies. Describe the following parts of your initial plans:

The reporting structures.

The physical location of personnel.

The placement of purchasing authority.

The coordination of activities with other functional groups.

Be creative with your design:

Recommendation:

Design a purchasing organizational chart
List Department Positions
Write Brief Job descriptions

Design a Purchasing Department structure that works within a Global Supply Chain. The purchasing departments are in 4 different continents for this organization. Design a purchasing structure that is efficient with value-added strategies.

The project should answer some of the following questions:

Why does this structure work efficiently?

How many levels of approval should be in place per category? Why?

What evaluation and or measurements should be involved? Why?

What obstacles can be avoided?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met