Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
CJR 102 Criminal Justice Criminal Case Study
Assignment:
I will give you your group a different crime to look up, and a theory to apply. The group will discuss how the theory(ies), as well as the different concepts and perspectives associated with the theory(ies), can be applied to the crime. Basically, I am looking to gauge whether or not you “get it.” If you can show how the elements and perspectives can be explained or applied to the crime, then you will have demonstrated to me that you understand the basic concept. I will you very basic details of the crime – it is your job as a group look up the crime details of the crime, as well as the theory I give you to apply.
Part of this assignment is to conduct research, for both the and theory, so that you can properly apply the theory.
As you prepare the presentation, you should ask yourselves:
Your presentation should include (but not be limited to) the following:
The case you are to research and discuss is:
Based on the information you gathered about this crime, please explain how Victim Precipitation Theory applies to this crime.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
CJR 102 Criminal Justice Criminal Case Study |
CJR 102 Criminal Justice Criminal Case Study