Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Community and Diversion Programs Argument Essay Discussion
Proposal for Researched Argument Essay
Please respond to the following question in a page or two. Also, remember that your topic must be derived from the subject areas discussed throughout the course. Finally, number your answers.
Topic:
Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity
Research Question: What is the question that you will be trying to answer in your research?
Background: Explain your interest in and experience with this issue. What have you already read about it? What made you choose it for your paper? Why are you interested in it?
Significance: Why is this issue worth considering? What makes it important enough to pursue for this class? What do you hope to learn from it?
Sources/Evidence: What kinds of sources and evidence do you anticipate you will need to use to support your thesis? Be as specific as possible.
Questions or Concerns: What questions or concerns do you have for me at this time about the research process?
HC 401 Herzing University Patient Centered Medical Homes Discussion
Unit 6 Assignment – Patient-Centered Medical Homes
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 65
Submitting a text entry box, a website URL, a media recording, or a file upload
Estimated time to complete: 3 hours
Instructions:
Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMHs) offer many benefits to patients, and are valued by providers and insurers, as well.
For this assignment, you will research and assess the past, present, and future role of PCMHs.
In an opening paragraph, define and concisely describe a PCMH.
In a second paragraph, explain the history of PCMHs.
For the body of your paper, explain the present structure and impact of PCMHs (approx. 500 words).
In a closing paragraph, explain the future role of PCMHs. Include relevant research to support your viewpoint.
Include a minimum of two scholarly sources on a separate reference page; APA format should be followed throughout.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
Submit:
Assignment in a Word document
Rubric
HC401 – Unit 6 Assignment
HC401 – Unit 6 Assignment | ||||||||
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent |
|
25.0 pts | ||||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P |
|
30.0 pts | ||||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing |
|
5.0 pts | ||||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I |
|
5.0 pts | ||||||
Total Points: 65.0 |
Community and Diversion Programs Argument Essay Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Community and Diversion Programs Argument Essay Discussion |
Community and Diversion Programs Argument Essay Discussion