Community Based Participatory Research Assignment Discussion

Community Based Participatory Research Assignment Discussion

Instructions:

Community Based Participatory Research Assignment Discussion

Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit.

Community-based participatory research (CBPR), is a partnership involving the community, community members, academic research and organizations approach to research. An example of the CBPR is the issues of diabetes in the Native American communities. Diabetes is a cardiovascular disease that occurs when blood glucose is too high. Diabetes affects more than 30 million Americans and is prevalent in people who are overweight and lack physical activity, and smoke. Due to health disparities, the Native Americans experience a disproportionate prevalence of diabetes with an incidence rate of 2.6 times more than other ethnicities. CBPR is used as a collaborative approach to research the health disparity issues by involving partners in research that can identify and processing factors associated with the issues and implement health intervention (Center from Disease Control and Prevention, 2019; Jernigan, 2010).

The intervention within the article was based on the Santa Clara Valley diabetes community action project (DCAP). The interventions were opening a clinic for the community whose goal was to strengthen community relationships and build trust and improve the management of diabetes. Additionally, a community forum on diabetes was created and information was distributed through a flyer that contained health fairs, community social and cultural gatherings. The events allowed the community to share dialogues and their opinions on health needs within the community. Healthy foods were provided at events to promote healthy eating. A diabetes support program was created to help the community manage their diabetes. A challenge to the intervention was that the Indian health center clinic was created for the Native Americans because of the high diabetes rate concerns. However, the clinic was taken over by predominately low-income Hispanics, where less than 30% of Native Americans were utilizing the clinic. However, this situation is a success because Hispanics are a community that has a high incidence rate in diabetes, and it is good that they have access to this clinic, which deemed the intervention a success (Minkler & Wallerstein, 2003; Jernigan, 2010).

The benefit of using the approach is it promotes community collaboration among the community members and healthcare members by building trust. The interventions were successful in engaging the community through different modes of interaction, education, and social change. Also, because of the effectiveness of the clinic, it became open to everyone as a low-income clinic. The clinic also became a culturally safe haven for the Native Americans because of the lack of cultural or community centers for the population (Jernigan, 2010). This approach could be used on obesity, with the same structure including cultural aspects to engage the diverse communities in participating in healthy events, such as support programs and low-income clinics that focus on the management of obesity, which will prevent co-morbidities, such as diabetes.

Reference

Center from Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). CDC works to prevent type 2 diabetes and improve the health of all people with diabetes. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/factsheets/diabetes-prediabetes.htm

Jernigan, B.B.V. (2010). Community-Based Participatory Research With Native American Communities: The Chronic Disease Self-Management Program. Health Promotion Practice, 11(6), 888-899. Doi: 10.1177/1524839909333374.

Minkler, M.; Wallerstein, N. Community based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003

Respond to the BOLD paragraph ABOVE by using one of the option below… in APA format with At least two references and a minimum of 200 words….. .(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.)

Ask a probing question.

Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.

Offer and support an opinion.

Validate an idea with your own experience.

Make a suggestion.

Expand on your colleague’s posting.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Community Based Participatory Research Assignment Discussion

Community Based Participatory Research Assignment Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!