Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Compare and Contrast Mobile Applications Verses Websites
From a development team of one to two people to an enterprise-level team with multiple divisions, the topic of mobile development will eventually come up. In no less than five (5) pages address the tasks below:
Compare & Contrast mobile applications vs websites.
Research and discuss the importance of developing a mobile strategy.
Discuss different system mobile functionalities.
Explain the social aspect of mobile interfaces.
Discuss two or three mobile application development myths.
Argue the need for adaptive vs dedicated mobile websites.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Use at least five (5) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment
Below is how everyone will be assessed for this graded discussion:
Besides cost, why should mobile app developers target the Android platform?
Why is Android competition to itself?
Describe key ingredients needed to create mobile applications on the iOS platform.
You have a roommate that is interested creating an Android and iOS app. With good team working ethics, you decide to conduct some research on the latest technology for any software packages or even app services which may be used to create an Android and iOS app. After conducting research, share a step-by-step process helping your roommate in getting started with the process of creating both an Android and iOS app based upon suggestions for software packages or services. In addition, and when recommending software and or app services, take into consideration if vendors offering such software packages or services offer any free learning resources and how helpful these resources may be in helping your roommate. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
The overall document of steps should be around two pages of content with equalized content allocated for coverage of Android and iOS.
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date.
Below is how everyone will be assessed for this graded:
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Compare and Contrast Mobile Applications Verses Websites |
Compare and Contrast Mobile Applications Verses Websites