Compare Systems Development Life Cycle Models Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Compare Systems Development Life Cycle Models Assignment
This research paper will compare and contrast Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Models. The research paper must be submitted using Safe Assign.
The paper will be five pages:
(a) Imagine you are the program manager for a software development company that specializes in inventory control software. You have just been hired by a company that develops laptops that can be customized by its customers. The company has hired you to develop an inventory control system. The system will be used to monitor products from customer design on the company’s website, customer order, payment, product construction, and shipping to the customer. Using the 7 Step SDLC Model, describe the events/tasks in each step that would occur in order to develop such a system. Make sure the description of each event/task is specific to the system you are trying to create. What metrics would
you use to verify the current step is complete and the events/tasks in the next step can begin? – 2 pages
(b) Consider a different SDLC Model (4 step or 12 step). Describe the events/tasks that would occur in each step if your company were to use this SDLC model instead. – 2 pages
(c) Under what circumstances would a company choose the SDLC Model described in part (a) over the SDLC Model described in part (b)? – 1 page
Your prior IST textbooks are an excellent source for finding SDLC models. Review chapter 17 in the text before beginning this paper. DO NOT discuss Methods in this paper (waterfall, rad etc…). You need to find other SDLC models, the
models will be called SDLC …some may have four steps and others may have 12 steps.
APA format; Minimum of 4 professional/peer review references. Note: Professional references refer to books and journals. (Typical internet resources are not considered professional resources).
1
CRIM 495 Past Present and Future of FARC Essay
This section is extremely malleable in that groups can include as much, or as little detail as needed to clarify what remains to the reader (e.g., stakeholder). However, this section needs to elucidate your group’s policy recommendations for
responding to the issue or phenomenon you have researched, and specifically, how. This will be rooted in the data you analyze and present. In order to complete this section, you will also need to present your results. This means, analyzing
your data according to your proposed Methodologies in Week 4.
For many of you, this is a simple quest (e.g., descriptive statistics, frequency distributions, etc.). Tables, graphs, charts, etc. will all be presented in this section alongside what has been done to address these groups/movements and what
should be done. If you need more help in contextualizing all of this jargon, please watch the “Data and Analysis” mini-lecture in the “Group Project” folder. Basically, this is a data-driven analysis. Some of you will dedicate your analysis the
group or movement (e.g. growth/decline/etc.) and others will focus on the impact of prior policy decisions and whether those policies were effective at curbing the terrorism you are examining (and why or why not). Regardless, you must
propose solutions to the group, phenomenon, or issue you examined.
These solutions must be clear, specific, and measurable. If the movement/group examined is no longer prevalent (i.e. has fragmented, dissolved, etc.), what should have been done to address this movement/group more effectively at the
time? The more creative and nuanced this section is, the easier it will be for groups to distinguish themselves from others. To be successful here, however, will require groups to adequately research what has been done before to address
the phenomenon in question (see Literature Review submission).
If something has been tried and has been a failure, then do not recommend it as a viable policy recommendation. If something has failed, but research has shown how this failure can be ameliorated in future policy, then be specific in
recommending what can be done in similar veins. This also means that groups will need to rely on evidence-based practices in crafting specific policy or program responses to the phenomenon. Hence why you need to rely on your data to
inform your decisions here. Complex problems often require multidimensional solutions. Please think long and hard about what you think would actually work and why in terms of addressing the movement, group, or phenomenon you are
studying.
The submission in question, at a minimum, will include the following information:
- What does your data show as to the nature of the problem(s)/group(s) examined?
o Over time?
o Now
?
o After certain policies were implemented?
- What needs to be done in terms of policy, program, or practice?
o If the movement/group examined is no longer prevalent (i.e. has fragmented, dissolved, etc.), what should have been done to address this movement/group more effectively? ▪ Be specific here.
This submission will also include any and all graphs, charts, plots, tables, and figures you create. It is expected that various forms of visuals be used to display your analyses.
2
Criminology Rational Choice Theories Discussion Questions
I’m working on a social science discussion question and need a sample draft to help me learn.
Chapter 13: Choosing Crime in Everyday Life: Routine Activity and Rational Choice Theories
Directions: Please answer two (2) of the following four (4) questions.
Explain the crime triangle. What are the elements and how does it explain crime causation?
The theories so far in this book have been focused on criminality. The theories in this chapter are focused on crime. Explain, in detail, that distinction. What does this mean for criminal justice policy?
Explain the process in which people choose to commit a crime according to rational choice theory? When doing so, what factors influence an individual’s choice to commit crime?
What role does emotions play in rational choice theories? How can emotions either lead to a higher probability of criminal behavior or lessen the likelihood of criminal behavior?
Compare Systems Development Life Cycle Models Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Compare Systems Development Life Cycle Models Assignment
Compare Systems Development Life Cycle Models Assignment