Components Of An IT System
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Components Of An IT System
The law prohibits enforcement officers from seizing evidence illegally. If one does so, the evidence is excluded from the case. The people vs. Zelinski case involved a private security guard who noticed a defendant placing a blouse inside her purse and arrested her. When the police searched for weapons, they discovered narcotics. In court, the evidence was declared illegal. This case raises concerns about whether the search and seizure rule should be applied to private security.
A recent case of search and seizure is the Joliet vs. Manuel case in 2017. Police officers searched Manuel during a routine traffic stop and found him with a bottle of pills, which they suspected were illegal substances. When tested, the technician revealed that all the drugs tested negative except one, which was positive for ecstasy. Manuel was taken to court, and the judge detained Manuel based on possessing controlled substances. When the pills were tested in a police laboratory in Illinois, the results revealed no controlled substances. Despite these results, the defendant was detained for 48 days before his release. In less than two years after he was released, the defendant filed a court case against Joilet and several enforcement officers. Although the court dismissed his claims, Manuel appealed the dismissal of his claim in court (Charleson, 2018).
In the USA vs. Lacey Lee Koenig and Lee Graf (Fed Ex) case, the Federal Express (Fed Ex) received a suspicious package containing a white powder for delivery. A field test revealed the powder was cocaine. At its terminus, the package was handled by a police officer who was also an employee of Fed Ex. The parcel was delivered to Ms. Koineg as indicated, and officers followed to the residence for a search that resulted in the package’s seizure. While still searching, Graf knocked and entered the house, and the police found him with $ 1,800. Both Ms. Koineg and Graf were charged for conspiring to distribute cocaine. To suppress the evidence, the two argue that the evidence resulted from an illegal search. Their efforts to suppress the evidence on the basis of illegality and intrusion of privacy failed, and they ended up being convicted. The Graf case was considered a conspiracy because such agreements are done secretly, and the government may not actually have proof. Further investigation revealed that Graf purchased cocaine frequently and in large quantities. Unlike in the Manuel and Joliet’s case, this one had enough proof of the crime. The second case also lacked any privacy interest or government interference of Fed Ex. Also, the evidence in the second case was based on a proper field test and legal investigation, while in the first case, Manuel was charged and detained on the basis of claims by the technician that the pill contained a controlled substance. The search in the second cause was also based on a probable cause (Henkin, 2019).
References
Charleson, L. H. (2018). Manuel v. City of Joliet: Pursuing a Claim Under the Fourth Amendment. Texas A&M Law Review, 5(1), 47-53.
Henkin, L. (2017). Search And Seizure.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!