Computer Architecture Ven Neumann Architecture Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Computer Architecture Ven Neumann Architecture Discussion
I’m working on a programming discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Discussion 4 Instructions
Choose one of the following questions and provide a minimum of 200 words in response to it:
Please choose one of the following options and answer following the guidelines for discussions. The last two are possible interview questions for digital design jobs.
What are the steps involved in an instruction cycle?
Explain the components Of the Ven Neumann Architecture?
What Are The different types Of fields that Are part Of an instruction?
Explain Flip-flops to someone who may not have heard the term, but is computer literate.
Please share with the class two concepts about programming logic and design you found interesting. Please be specific and provide examples to receive full points.
Minimum word count 150.Computer Architecture Ven Neumann Architecture Discussion
Computer Architecture Ven Neumann Architecture Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Computer Architecture Ven Neumann Architecture Discussion
Computer Architecture Ven Neumann Architecture Discussion