Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Conceptual Frameworks in Programs Assignment Discussion
I’m working on a social science question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Please review the lecture on Program Theory. Explain the saliency of developing programs that are rooted in theory/conceptual framework? Explain why programs can sway from their theoretical/conceptual framework that guides their program? Can having a larger agency compared to small agency make a difference in being aligned to a theoretical frame? Also, can addressing a multitude of issues also impact the theoretical/conceptual framework, if yes, how?
National Institute on Deafness & Other Communication Disorders Research Paper
A research paper that critically engages with a topic of deaf gain for disability studies, you will use disability studies concepts to ground your paper and as a lens through which your topic is conveyed. Most papers begin with a bit of background information, have an argument/thesis, 3-4 distinct sections with headers, and concluding remarks/a call to action. Each section should be directly related to your overarching argument or thesis and must be supported by evidence from research and personal accounts from people with disabilities themselves.
1, Required length: 6-8 pages
2, APA format
3, Sources: 7-10 sources (at least 4 scholarly and 3 that are written by or reflect the opinions of people with disabilities)
4, Language use: Refer to the Disability Language Style Guide to determine which disability
language to use
5, Disability studies concepts: at least 3 (i.e. paternalism, crip culture, ableism)
Conceptual Frameworks in Programs Assignment Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Conceptual Frameworks in Programs Assignment Discussion |
Conceptual Frameworks in Programs Assignment Discussion