Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Corporate Tax Minimization: Legal vs. Ethical
APA format
175 – 265 words
Cite at least one (1) peer-reviewed reference
Respond to the following:
Dr. Bill Berry
Global Trade and Social Responsibility
Hi All,
Today’s best question is, “Should companies like Apple be considered great for minimizing their US tax burden?” While legally, this can be done, and many shareholders believe it is a good thing, many feel companies have a debt to society, which is a way of avoiding that debt. Before World War II, transportation costs often made global trade more costly, and manufacturing occurred in places that minimized these costs or were close to the sales point. Since then, we have seen steady declines in shipping costs, which have increased global trade and made situations like those at Apple possible.
Should laws be passed that reflect morality, or should people, including investors and corporate management, be reflective of the values expressed in society? What should a Christian leader do? Is Apple’s approach great or merely profitable?
Dr. Bill
Hoxie, J. (2018, January 18). Commentary: Apple Avoided $40 Billion in Taxes. Now It wants a gold star? Fortune; Fortune. https://fortune.com/2018/01/18/apple-bonuses-money-us-350-billion-taxes-trump/
9/3/22 10:25 AM
Corporate Tax Minimization: Legal vs. Ethical
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |