Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
course project case study
1.
Top of Form
Continue your course project case study by describing your child’s cognitive development. You are continuing your child’s story.
NOTE: Include at least one resource to substantiate your description. This resource can come from the course, the Rasmussen College Library or credible websites (Wikipedia, About.com and blogs are not considered credible websites).
Incorporate your resource into your paper using in-text citations and a reference page in APA format.
Write about your child by answering the following questions. Be sure to write in paper format with title page, paragraphs and an introduction. Your paper should be 2-4 pages in length. You may choose to write as if you are telling a story and
your instructor is the reader. Think deeply and be thorough in your responses.
· What is the child’s stage of cognitive development according to Piaget? How do you know? What concepts will your child exhibit? Provide at least three examples and use your resources to support your description.
· What mathematical concepts does your child understand? What mathematical concepts does your child not exhibit at this time? How do you know? Provide an example and use your resource to support your description.
· What is your child’s learning preference? How do you know? Provide an example which illustrates that preference.
· What are your child’s favorite activities in preschool? What might these favorite activities tell you about your child’s cognitive development? Use your resources to support your description.
Submit your paper with a title page and in APA format.
Bottom of Form
course project case study
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
course project case study