Courts and the Administration of Justice
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Courts and the Administration of Justice
Description
The criminal is to go free because the constable has blundered.”
This is a common adage used to describe the exclusionary rule. The police did wrong by violating her constitutional rights so a defendant, even though she may be guilty, may end up without punishment. Is this a proper or adequate means of deterring and/or compensating for police officers who deliberately or otherwise violate an individual’s constitutional rights in the pursuit of an arrest or for those who lie on the witness stand?
Similarly, plea bargains in criminal cases and settlements in civil cases are compromises. Neither side (the defendant or the victim/public in criminal cases and the plaintiff or defendant in civil cases) receives a full measure of justice.
All of this is done to preserve the administration of justice — not the rights of the parties or the interests of the public. Since the majority of all cases — civil and criminal — are resolved in this manner, does this mean that there really is no justice in American courts? Are there better ways of doing things without forcing a collapse of the justice system? Consider the discussions on abolition of the exclusionary rule and abolition of plea bargaining
You might also cite examples from news articles, books, television shows or movies of such injustices.
You should address these questions in a paper of approximately 2,400 words, relying primarily on the readings and other materials assigned in this module; you will not receive credit without demonstrating that you have read and understood the material assigned. You may include independent sources. All information should be documented in MLA style.
Courts and the Administration of Justice
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Courts and the Administration of Justice