COVID 19 Essay and the Social Ecological Model
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
The Social Ecological Model is a widely used model in public health and health promotion to describe the interaction between a variety of elements that influence health behavior (personal, social, cultural, and economic
aspects) (see the logic model of the Social Ecological Model in Blackboard). COVID-19 is a pandemic that is impacting a wide range of people from various socioeconomic, cultural, and cultural origins. Discuss how the five
levels (intrapersonal, interpersonal, community, organizational, and public policy) may be impacting how people are responding to the pandemic in a healthy or unhealthy way using the Social Ecological Model. How do the
model’s five tiers affect topics like COVID prevention, treatment, government engagement, testing, and so on? You should be able to access and read about COVID studies as well as the various elements that influence
people’s decisions about how to respond to the virus. Discuss the relationship between the Social Ecological Model and COVID-19 in 3-5 paragraphs. For your 3-page review, make sure you adhere to APA criteria. This entails
creating a title page, following proper citation guidelines throughout your paper, and includes a reference page. If you are unfamiliar with APA guidelines, I recommend reading the handbook, researching them online, and/or
visiting the Purdue OWL (Online Writing Lab) website. This assignment will be graded using the following criteria (rubric accessible for review in Bb):
Recognize the Problem: Recognize the links between numerous concerns that affect well-being in complex environments. The evident and subtle linkages between/among the sub-parts or situational conditions of a
scenario that bring two or more dilemmas/problems into the problem are referred to as interconnections of issues in complex situations (e.g., relationship of health screenings to increased health care costs).
Ability to apply discipline-based knowledge to decision-making and/or propose a recommended plan of action based on discipline-specific knowledge.
Decision Impact: The good or bad effects of decisions on one’s own well-being, the well-being of others, society, and/or the environment (s).
Check out this page for more information on the Social Ecological Model. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-buffalo-environmentalhealth/part/chapter-3/ The linked RLA rubric will be used to grade this assignment.
When writing your paper, it is highly recommended that you apply the rubric
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow